Intralogistics and Cybersecurity – The Next Major Risk?

Intralogistics is undergoing a profound transformation. Automated warehouses, driverless transport systems, autonomous mobile robots, intelligent conveyor technology, and cloud-based control systems are driving greater efficiency, transparency, and speed throughout the entire value chain. What was long considered a vision of the future is now a reality in many companies. However, increasing digitalization is creating a new vulnerability—and this is precisely what is still underestimated in many places.

In many companies, cybersecurity is still primarily viewed as a traditional IT issue: the focus is on firewalls, email security, or the protection of Office systems. Operational technology (OT) in intralogistics, on the other hand, often only comes into focus once an incident has already occurred. Yet cyberattacks on automated warehouse and material flow systems can have serious consequences: production downtime, delivery delays, economic losses, and, in the worst case, even risks to people and equipment.

The crucial question is therefore: Is cybersecurity in intralogistics becoming the next major risk factor?

Modern intralogistics systems are highly networked today. Conveyor technology communicates with warehouse management systems, autonomous vehicles exchange position data in real time, and sensors continuously deliver information to central platforms. Added to this are remote maintenance access points for manufacturers and integrators, as well as the increasing use of cloud services.

This connectivity creates enormous advantages:

• greater efficiency
• lower error rates
• better utilization
• greater transparency
• predictive maintenance

However, every interface also represents a potential gateway for cybercriminals. Particularly critical is the fact that many OT systems were not originally developed with IT security in mind. Numerous logistics centers still run older control systems whose security architecture is not designed for modern threat scenarios.

While traditional IT systems are updated regularly, OT often has different priorities: availability and stability take precedence above all else. Updates are postponed or not performed at all out of concern for production disruptions. This is precisely what makes many facilities vulnerable.

Ransomware is now one of the greatest threats to industrial and logistics companies. Attackers encrypt systems and data in order to subsequently demand a ransom. In intralogistics, the consequences can be particularly dramatic.

If a warehouse management system fails or communication between control levels is interrupted, the material flow often comes to a complete standstill. Conveyor systems stop, picking processes are interrupted, and autonomous vehicles lose their navigation data. Even a few hours of downtime can result in immense costs—especially in highly automated distribution centers with just-in-time processes.

The real problem, however, often runs deeper: While many companies have backup strategies for their IT, they do not have them for their OT infrastructure. Control systems, PLCs, or industrial network components are often not adequately secured or documented. Recovery can therefore take days or even weeks.

There is another factor at play: Cybercriminals are increasingly recognizing the high economic pressure within logistics supply chains. Companies are more willing to pay ransoms when production or delivery disruptions are imminent. This is precisely why the industry is becoming increasingly attractive to professional attackers.

Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs) and Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMRs) are considered essential tools of modern intralogistics. They transport goods autonomously through warehouses, communicate with control centers, and react dynamically to their environment. Yet it is precisely this connectivity that poses significant risks.

Many systems operate via Wi-Fi, use centralized fleet management software, or communicate via standardized protocols. If these connections are not adequately secured, potential vulnerabilities arise:

• Manipulation of routes
• Failure of entire vehicle fleets
• Access to movement data
• Communication disruption
• Sabotage of logistics processes

A compromised AGV system can not only cause economic damage but also create safety risks for employees. If vehicles react unpredictably or navigation data is manipulated, real dangers arise during ongoing operations.

This becomes particularly critical in large automated warehouses with hundreds of networked vehicles. Here, even a small vulnerability can have far-reaching consequences.

Conveyor technology is rarely associated with cybersecurity. In fact, however, it is one of the central components of modern OT landscapes. Conveyor systems are closely linked to control systems, sensors, scanners, and warehouse management systems.

If this infrastructure is attacked, massive disruptions are possible:

• incorrect material allocation
• blocked conveyor lines
• misrouting of goods
• failure of entire sorting systems
• manipulation of sensor data

The high complexity of many systems is particularly problematic. Different manufacturers, proprietary interfaces, and system landscapes that have evolved over time make it difficult to implement a comprehensive security strategy.

In addition, remote maintenance access points are often inadequately secured. External service providers require access to control systems and diagnostic systems—yet it is precisely these access points that are repeatedly exploited by attackers.

A common misconception among many companies is that IT security and OT security (operational technologies) are one and the same. In reality, however, the two areas differ significantly.

While IT is primarily concerned with data protection and information security, OT focuses primarily on operational security. Production and logistics facilities must remain available around the clock. A reboot or an unplanned update can already have critical consequences.

OT security therefore encompasses far more than traditional firewalls or virus scanners. Key factors include:

• Network segmentation
• Access controls
• Secure remote maintenance
• Continuous monitoring
• Patch management
• Backup and recovery strategies
• Employee training
• Incident response processes

Separating IT and OT networks is particularly important. In many companies, direct connections still exist here without sufficient security barriers. If malware from the office IT environment enters production or logistics systems, this can have serious consequences.

Alongside technical developments, regulatory pressure on companies is also growing. Cybersecurity is increasingly becoming a mandatory requirement.

The international standard ISO 27001 defines requirements for an information security management system (ISMS). The goal is to systematically identify risks, establish security measures, and continuously improve processes. For companies with highly networked intralogistics, this certification is becoming increasingly important—also in terms of customer requirements and tenders.

In addition, the European NIS2 Directive is coming increasingly into focus. It significantly expands cybersecurity requirements and will affect far more companies in the future than before. In particular, operators of critical infrastructure as well as large industrial and logistics companies must implement stricter security measures and report security incidents.

The topic of KRITIS also plays an important role. Logistics and supply chains are increasingly considered systemically important. If a large distribution center or an automated logistics network fails, it can have far-reaching economic consequences.

In the future, companies will therefore no longer be evaluated solely on the basis of efficiency and the degree of automation, but also on their cyber resilience.

The days when cybersecurity was merely a peripheral IT issue are over. In modern intralogistics, security is evolving into a decisive factor for success.

Customers, partners, and insurance companies are paying increasing attention to how companies secure their systems. At the same time, the financial risks posed by attacks are rising continuously. Production downtime, contractual penalties, reputational damage, and regulatory consequences can cause enormous harm.

Companies should therefore act early:

• Analyze security risks
• Review OT architectures
• Raise employee awareness
• Develop emergency plans
• Establish security standards
• Test systems regularly

A holistic approach is particularly important here. Cybersecurity must not be viewed in isolation but must be an integral part of the overall intralogistics strategy.

Intralogistics is becoming increasingly intelligent, autonomous, and networked—and precisely because of this, it is also becoming more vulnerable.

Ransomware, security vulnerabilities in AGVs, insecure conveyor systems, and inadequately protected OT systems are becoming real threats to companies of all sizes.

Many organizations still underestimate the risks within their operational infrastructure. But the question is no longer whether cyberattacks on intralogistics will occur, but when.

Anyone investing in automation today must therefore invest in cybersecurity at the same time. After all, even the most powerful intralogistics system is of little use if it comes to a standstill in an emergency.

How we approach maintenance
See our other blog posts
Back to the homepage